Content Manager: Content Model
Architectural considerations aside, the most distinguished element in the design of the Content Manager is its content model. Rather than settle for a fixed set of document structures, the service adopts a generic structure that can act as a 'carrier' for an arbitrary number of concrete document models. In particular, the service deals with edge-labelled and node-attributed trees, the gDoc
trees.
The expectation here is that producers (service plugins) and consumers (service clients) will convene on concrete document models and exchange gDoc
trees with an agreed shape. The agreement may be bilateral or involve any number of parties, and it may apply to the entire document or to distinguished parts of it (e.g. document metadata, annotations, raw content packaging, etc). For maximum decoupling between consumers and producers, the agreement may reflect system-wide conventions and result in canonical tree forms.
Contents
gDoc Trees
A gDoc
tree has the following properties:
- its nodes may have an identifier and a number of uniquely named attributes;
- its edges have a label;
- its leaf nodes may have a value;
- its root may identify the collection of the corresponding document.
In particular:
- identifiers, attributes, and leaves have text values;
- attribute names and labels may be qualified with a namespace.
The figure below uses a graphical representation to show an example of a gDoc
tree.
gDoc
trees serialise to XML documents for exchange over the network. In particular:
- nodes serialise to elements and attributes serialise to element attributes
- elements are named like the edges that enter the corresponding nodes, with the exception of the document element which is named
http://gcube-system.org/namespaces/contentmanagement/gdoc:godc
- elements are named like the edges that enter the corresponding nodes, with the exception of the document element which is named
- the elements that correspond to inner nodes contain the elements that correspond to their children
- the elements that correspond to leaves contain their value
- node identifiers serialise to attributes called
http://gcube-system.org/namespaces/contentmanagement/gdoc:id
- collection identifiers serialise to attributes called
http://gcube-system.org/namespaces/contentmanagement/gdoc:collID
For example, the gDoc
tree above serialises as:
note gDoc
trees inherit constraints from their XML serialisation. In particular, the names of edges, the names of attributes, the values of attributes, and the values of leaves are regulated by the definition of the format.
gDoc API
The XML serialisation of gDoc
trees is 'natural', in that it does not employ dedicated element structures for the representations nodes, edges, attributes, etc. This streamlines its manipulation with standard XMl technologies (e.g. XPath, XSLT, XQuery, DOM, SAX, etc.) and does not inhibit object binding technologies (e.g. JAXB, XStream, etc).
As a native option, however, the service defines a bespoke object model and API for gDoc
trees which offer:
- dedicated support for tree processing requirements associated with the use of the service;
- transparencies and optimisations for tree storage, construction, deconstruction, and input/output.
While the model is available to service clients, it also forms the basis of the interface between the service and its plugins. For this reason, its main features are overviewed here while its client-oriented features are discussed later on.
As the figure below illustrates, the model is defined in org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.trees
in terms of the following components:
-
Node
: an abstract base for nodes with an identifier, a state, and a map ofQName
-ed attributes. -
State
: an inner enumeration ofNode
for node states. -
Edge
: AQName
-ed edge to a targetNode
. -
InnerNode
: aNode
with a list of outgoingEdge
s. -
Leaf
: aNode
with a value. -
gDoc
: anInnerNode
with a collection identifier. -
Nodes
: a collection of static utilities to generateNode
s andEdge
s. -
Bindings
: a collection of static utilities to serialise and deserialiseNodes
s to and from DOM trees and/or character streams. -
NodeView
: a base class for JAXB bindings toNode
s. -
GDocView
: aNodeViewM
for JAXB bindings toGDoc
nodes.
The model API is illustrated by example in the rest of this Section. The full list of methods and their signatures can be found in the code documentation.
Building Trees
The first and obvious way to create gDoc
trees is with the constructors of the concrete node classes (GDoc
, InnerNode
, Leaf
).
As a first example, the following code illustrates the creation of a tree with an attributed root and two leaf nodes:
GDoc doc = new GDoc("someid"); doc.setAttribute(new QName("x"), "1"); doc.setAttribute(new QName("someNS","y"), new Date().toString()); doc.collectionID("..."); Leaf leaf1 = new Leaf(null,"2"); //no identifier Leaf leaf2 = new Leaf(null,"true"); Edge e1 = new Edge(new QName("a"),leaf1); Edge e2 = new Edge(new QName("someNS","b"),leaf2); doc.add(e1,e2);
While already more convenient than cross-language and format-oriented tree APIs (e.g. DOM), step-by-step construction is verbose, even in the case of small trees.
For a first degree of improvement, the node classes offer rich suites of constructors and setter overloads that allow for more 'in-lined' tree constructions and absorb the creation of QName
s:
GDoc doc2 = new GDoc("someid", new Edge("a", new Leaf(null,"2")), new Edge("someNS","b", new Leaf(null,"true"))); doc2.setAttribute("x", "1"); doc2.setAttribute("someNS","y", new Date().toString()); doc2.collectionID("somecollID");
For additional convenience, the Nodes
class defines a large number of generators, i.e. factory methods that can be statically imported and then composed into an 'embedded expression language' for gDoc
trees:
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.trees.Nodes.*; ... GDoc doc3 = attr( gdoc("somecollID","someid", e("a",2), e("someNS","b",true)), a("x",1),a("someNS","y",new Date()));>
Here, gdoc
, attr
, e
, a
are examples of node, attribute, and edge generators. Besides allowing fully in-lined tree expressions without the use of the new
operator, the generators offer QName
creation transparencies and object-to-string conversion transparencies (cf. the int
, boolean
, and Date
example above). The transparency of date conversions is particularly important here, as it ensures adherence to XML serialisation standards that are not natively adopted in Java (e.g. in the implementation of toString
). See the code documentation for the full list of available generators, as well as for the additional examples that follow:
doc = gdoc(); doc = gdoc("someid"); doc = gdoc("collectionid","someid"); doc = gdoc("1", e("a", n("2", //n() => inner node generator e("b",l("3",0))))); doc = gdoc( //no identifier e("a", attr( n("2", e("b",l("3",0)), //l()= explicit leaf generator for identity assignment e("a",l("4",0))), a("foo","0")))); doc = attr(gdoc("1", e("a",l("2",5)), e("b",attr( n("3",e("c",4)), a("foo",0))), e("c",5)), a("x",0)); doc = attr(gdoc("1", e("a", n("2", e("b",n("$2")))), e("a",n("a1", e("c",n( e("d","..."), e("d",attr( //l()= explicit leaf generator for attribute assignments l("<xml>..</xml>"), a("w",".."))))))), e("b",attr( n("1:/2"), a("w","...")))), a("x","http://org.acme:8080"),a("y","<a>...</a>"));
The literal construction of trees is particularly convenient in during testing, though it composes well with the programmatic construction in the development of production code:
Edge edge = .... InnerNode node = ....; attr( node.add(e("before","..."), edge, e("after","...")) ), a("newattr","...");
note: the node classes override equals
for equivalence-based comparisons, and hashCode
for their correct use as keys within hash-based data structures, and toString
for convenience of debugging.
Serialising and Deserialising Trees
The Bindings
class offers static facilities to transform native models of gDoc
trees into XML-based models. Two representations are supported natively, based on which other XML-based representation can be produced using standard platform facilities (e.g. TRAX):
-
Bindings.toElement(GDoc)
converts native models ofgDoc
trees into equivalent DOM models. -
Bindings.fromElement(Element)
converts DOM models ofgDoc
trees into equivalent native models. -
Bindings.toXML(GDoc, Writer, boolean?)
converts the native model into XML document streams, optionally excluding document declarations. -
Bindings.fromXML(Reader)
converts XML document streams intogDoc
trees.
note: DOM conversions of native models are implemented directly, as they are most commonly required for interactions with the Content Manager service. Stream conversions are instead derived from DOM conversions via TRAX, at an additional processing cost.
note: conversions from native models to XML-based models assign the conventional name http://gcube-system.org/namespaces/contentmanagement/gdoc:gdoc
(cf. Bindings.GDOC_NS
, and Bindings.GDOC_NAME
constants) to the document element. Vice versa, conversion from XML-based representations to native models discard the name of the document element.
Here is a usage example, which shows that equivalence of native models is preserved under round-trip conversions.
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.trees.Bindings.*; ... GDoc doc = .... //DOM conversion GDOc doc2 = fromElement(toElement(doc)); assert doc.equals(doc2); //true! //stream conversion StringWriter w = new StringWriter(); toXML(doc,w); GDOC doc3 = fromXML(w.toString()); assert doc.equals(doc3); //true!
note: due to the treatment of root element names, equivalence of XML-based representations is not necessarily preserved after round-trip conversion. It is preserved only if the XML-based representations have been previously produced with the conversion routines.
note: in all the conversions above, null
values in attribute and leaf values are serialised using a special constant (exposed programmatically as Node.NULL
).
note: the conversions are also available at arbitrary inner nodes, not only roots (cf. Bindings.nodeToElement(Node, QName?)
, Bindings.nodeFromElement(Element)
,Bindings.nodeToXML(Node, Writer, QName)
, and Bindings.nodeFromXML(Reader)
.
Consuming Trees
The gDoc
API offers simple means of procedural tree navigation. For declarative queries, clients can convert the model into an XML-based representation and leverage platform standards and popular offerings (e.g. XPath, XQuery, or XSLT implementations). If required, the gDoc
API can then be reasserted on query outputs.
The Node
class defines methods to expose the state common to all nodes of a gDoc
tree:
-
id()
: returns the identifier. -
parent()
: returns the parent. -
ancestors()
: returns the list of all nodes from the parent to the root. -
ancestorsAndSelf()
: behavesancestors
but the returned list includes and starts with the recipient node. -
attributes()
: returns a copy of the attributes, indexed by name. -
attribute(QName)
: returns the value of an attribute with the given name (or fails). -
hasAttribute(QName)
: checks for the existence of an attribute with a given name.
note: identifiers can only be set at node creation time. Attributes can be added, modified, and removed at any point (cf. Node.state(Node.State)
, setAttribute(QName,String)
, removeAttribute(QName)
).
note: for convenience, all methods that take QName
s are overloaded to accept local names as well as (namespace,local name) pairs.
note: invoking methods that take node types is simplified by statically importing the class constants defined in the Nodes
class (cf. Nodes.N
for InnerNode.class
and Nodes.L
for Leaf.class
).
The Leaf
class adds methods to read and set the value (cf. value()
, value(String)
).
The InnerNode
class adds methods to navigate along edges and or identifiers:
-
children()
: returns the list of children. -
children(QName)
: returns the list of children under edges whose label matches a given label. -
<T extends Node> children(class<T>)
: returns the list of children of a given node type. -
<T extends Node> children(class<T>, QName)
: returns the list of children of a given node type under edges whose label matches a given label. -
child(QName)
: returns the child under an edge whose label matches a given label (or fails if there are zero o more such children). -
<T extends Node> child(Class<T>, QName)
:returns the child of a given node type under an edge whose label matches a given label (or fails if there are zero o more such children). -
descendants(QName*)
: returns the list of descendants that can be reached following edges whose labels match a given label. -
<T extends Node> descendants(Class<T>,QName*)
: returns the list of descendants of a given type that can be reached following edges whose labels match a given label. -
edges()
: returns the list of all the edges. -
edges(QName)
: returns the list of edges whose label matches a given label. -
edge(QName)
: returns the list of edges whose labels match a given label (o fails if there are zero or more such edges). -
hasEdge(QName)
: checks for the existence of an edge whose label matches a given label. -
labels()
: returns the list of all edge labels. -
labels(QName)
: returns the list of labels that match a given label.
note: edges can be added or more removed at any time (cf. add(Edge*)
, removeEdge(Edge*)
, removeEdge(QName)
).
note: all matches on qualified names are based on arbitrary regular expressions, both on the namespace and the local name of the label.
note: as above, methods that take QName
s have overloads that accepts local names and, where appropriate, overloads that accept (namespace,local name) pairs.
note: as above, invoking methods that take node types is simplified by statically importing the corresponding constants in Nodes
(cf. Nodes.N
, Nodes.L
).
The GDoc
class adds a method to read and set the collection identifier (cf. collectionID
, collectionID(String)
).
Finally, the Edge
class exposes its label and target (cf. label()
, target()
).
The following example illustrates some of the supported idioms, do check the code documentation for detailed information about method signatures:
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.trees.Nodes.*; GDoc doc = attr(gdoc("1", e("a",l("2",5)), e("b",attr( n("3",e("c",4)), a("foo",0))), e("c",5)), a("x",0)); //typed children String val = doc.child(L,"a").value(); //typed descendant String val2 = doc.descendant(N,"3").child(L,"c").value(); for (InnerNode node : doc.children(N)) for (QName l : node.labels()) //process label for (Node d : doc.descendants("b","e")) for (Edge siblingEdge : d.parent().edges()) if (siblingEdge.target()!=d) //process sibling of descendant
Binding Trees
Clients that expect gDoc
trees of a given form may wish to bind them to objects. The API offers two classes to streamline JAXB object bindings in the package org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.views
. In particular, it includes two base classes for node and document bindings to XML serialisations of gDoc
trees:
-
NodeView
is a base class for node bindings. The view binds and exposes the identifier of the node as well as the URL of the node, if one exists (cf.getID()
,getURL()
). Node URLs are discussed later.
-
GDocView
extendsNodeView
as a base class for document bindings. The view binds and exposes the collection identifier of the root node (cf.getCollID()
), in addition to what already bound and exposed via its superclass.
Clients can extend these classes and the corresponding bindings. The following example illustrates:
@XmlRootElement(name=Bindings.GDOC_NAME,namespace=Bindings.GDOC_NS) class MyDocView extends GDocView { @XmlElement(namespace="http://acme.org") int i; @XmlElement(namespace="http://acme.org") MyDocComponent c; class MyDocComponent extends MyNodeView { @XmlElement Date date; }
MyDocView
and MyDocComponent
are toy examples of user-defined views over gDoc
trees and tree nodes, and they should be familiar to JAXB users.
MyDocView
extends GDocView
and uses JAXB annotations to specify the qualified name of the document elements to which it will be bound. Here we have chosen a name that aligns with the serialisations produced by the Bindings
class, as shown above, but different names may be specified if the binding target serialisations produced through different means.MyDocView
then includes two fields in its own namespace, an integer field and a MyDocComponent
field, both of which are bound to XML elements. MyDocComponent
extends NodeView
, specifies a single Date
, and uses JAXB annotations to bind it to an XML element. In both classes, we have chosen simple JAXB annotations. For example, we have assumed that the gDoc
trees that will come to binding have labels that match the field names. The full range of JAXB facilities is of course available to customise bindings to less aligned trees.
Suppose now MyDocView
is to be bound to the gDoc
tree below. Wee use the generators of the gDoc API to denote the tree, but this is just for convenience of exposition; the tree may have been generated through any suitable means.
GDoc doc = gdoc("collID","123", e(NS,"i",3), e(NS,"c", n("789", e("d",l("1",new Date())), e("b",l("2",15)))), e(NS,"d",new Date()), e(NS,"b",n("456")));
Clearly, the tree contains a subset that matches the binding expectations of the classes above. As with all JAXB clients, the binding would require steps similar to the following:
JAXBContext context = JAXBContext.newInstance(MyDocView.class); ... //assuming a DOM binding to the tree has already occurred (other JAXB inputs could have been used instead, e.g. character streams) Element docElement = .... //bind MyDocView mv = (MyDocView) context.createUnmarshaller().unmarshal(docElement); ...mv.id()... ...mv.collID()... ...mv.url()... ...mv.i... ...mv.c... ...mv.id()... ...mv.url()... ...mv.c.d... //serialiase (again to DOM) Document dom = ....; Marshaller m = context.createMarshaller(); m.marshal(mv,dom);
gDoc Predicates
The gDoc
model is untyped, in that neither the topology of trees nor the values of their attributes or leaves are subjected to constraints (beside those dictated by the XML serialisation).
Types are reintroduced later, under the view that they can be projected on gDoc
trees at the point of consumption.
Type projections serve two main purposes in the context of the Content Manager:
- to validate the content of
gDoc
trees.
- The main use case for validation is at the point of content ingestion through the write operations of the Content Manager. In particular, a plugin may project a type on incoming
gDoc
trees, with a view to rejecting those that fail the projection.
- to identify the data of interest within
gDoc
trees.
- The main use case for content identification is at the point of content retrieval through the read operations of the Content Manager. Through the service, in particular, a client may ask plugins to return only the portion of the data that succeeds the projection, and to discard the rest. Content pruning results in minimal bandwidth consumption and delivers content to client in forms which are optimal for their own object bindings.
Accordingly, support for type projections requires:
- a language of tree types with which clients and plugins can capture the required shape and content of
gDoc
trees. - the ability to project such types over
gDoc
trees with both validation and pruning semantics.
XML schema languages are natural candidates for the choice of tree types. However, the also introduce complexity - both conceptually and in terms of tooling - which is not required when working with the subset of XML that corresponds to the gDoc
model. As importantly, schema languages are strongly associated with validation and there are no implementations that use them towards document pruning (or indeed content extraction).
Accordingly, the tree API includes a native language of tree types, the gDoc
predicates, as well as support for projecting them over content for validation and pruning purposes. gDoc
predicates, in particular, can be used to constrain:
- the topology of
gDoc
trees, including the labels and cardinality of edges (e.g. the existence of at least one edge whose label matches a given label). - the values of leaves, so that they conform to the textual literal of a range of atomic types (e.g. numbers or boolean values) or simply verify some type-specific predicate.
note: Support for predicates on attributes is forthcoming.
Predicate API
gDoc
predicates are defined in the packages org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.predicates
and org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.constraints
, the main components of which are the following:
-
Predicate
: the interface of all node predicates, definesmatch(Node)
andprune(Node)
methods for validation-based and pruning-based projection semantics.-
AnyPredicate
: aPredicate
that specifies no constraints on nodes, i.e. matches any node and prunes nothing from it. -
TreePredicate
: aPredicate
that specifies a list ofEdgePredicate
s on inner nodes. -
LeafPredicate
: aPredicate
that specifies aConstraint
s on the value of leaf nodes.-
Bool
: anLeafPredicate
that specifies a booleanConstraint
on the value of leaf nodes. -
Num
: anLeafPredicate
that specifies a numericConstraint
on the value of leaf nodes. -
Text
: anLeafPredicate
that specifies a textualConstraint
on the value of leaf nodes. -
Date
: anLeafPredicate
that specifies a dateConstraint
on the value of leaf nodes. -
URI
: anLeafPredicate
that specifies a URIConstraint
on the value of leaf nodes. -
ID
: aLeafPredicate
on the identifier of an inner node .
-
-
-
EdgePredicate
: a predicate that specifies a nodePredicate
on the targets of edges whose labels match a given label.-
One
: anEdgePredicate
that asserts the existence of exactly one edge whose label matches a given label and whose target matches a given predicate. -
Opt
: anEdgePredicate
that asserts the existence of zero or one edges whose labels match a given label and whose targets match a given predicate. -
AtLeast
: anEdgePredicate
that asserts the existence of one or more edges whose labels match a given label and whose targets match a given predicate. -
Many
: anEdgePredicate
that asserts the existence of zero or more edges whose labels match a given label and whose targets match a given predicate. -
Only
: anEdgePredicate
that asserts that all the edges whose labels match a given label match also a given predicate.
-
-
Predicates
: factory methods for an expression language of tree predicates.
-
Constraint
: the interface of all constraints over values of leaf nodes.-
Same
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that are equivalent to a given value. -
Match
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that match a given regular expression. -
More
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that are numbers strictly greater than a given number. -
Less
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that are number strictly smaller than a given number. -
Before
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that are earlier dates than a given date. -
After
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that are later dates than a given date. -
Not
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that do not satisfy anotherConstraint
. -
Either
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that satisfy at least one of a number of otherConstraint
s. -
All
: theConstraint
that is satisfied by values that satisfy a number of otherConstraint
s.
-
-
Constraints
: factory methods for an expression language ofConstraint
s.
Building Predicates
Similarly to gDoc
trees, gDoc
predicates may be built with classic constructor-based idioms and/or else with predicate generators, a collection of factory methods in the Predicates
class and Constraints
classes which can be statically imported and then composed into a pseudo expression language for gDoc
predicates. We concentrate here on predicate generators as the preferred way to build gDoc
predicates. See the code documentation for the constructors available in predicate and constraint classes.
Consider this first example:
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.constraints.Constraints.*; import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.predicates.Predicates.*; Predicate p = tree( one("a", num(more(6))));
Here, tree()
generates a TreePredicate
which characterises trees which satisfy a single EdgePredicate
. This latter predicate requires that the trees have exactly one outgoing edge with label a
and with a leaf target. This leaf must in turn satisfy a Num
predicate, i.e. its text value must represent a number and this number must satisfy a More
constraint, which requires it to be greater than 6
. In summary, we are characterising trees with a single a
-edge that ends in a leaf with a number greater than 6
.
The following example showcases a range of other predicates and constraints:
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.constraints.Constraints.*; import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.predicates.Predicates.*; Predicate p = tree( one("a",any()), one("b",text(either(is("abc"),is("efg")))), atleast("c",bool(is(true))), opt("d",tree()), many("e",date(future())), one("f", uri(matches("^http.*"))), many("g", num(all(less(5),more(10)))), one("h", text()), one("j",text(not(is("somestring")))), one("k",id("12345",tree())), only("l", num()));
Here, the predicate characterises trees with:
- a single
a
-edge that ends in any type of node, inner node or leaf. (any()
is a generator ofAnyPredicate
s); - a single
b
-edge that ends in a leaf whose value is either one of two strings; - one or more
c
-edges that end in leaves with a boolean value oftrue
; - zero or one
d
-edges that end in inner nodes; - zero or more
e
-edges that end in leaves whose values are dates in the future; - a single
f
-edge that ends in a leaf whose value is an absolute http URI; - zero or more
g
-edges that end in leaves whose values are numbers between5
and10
; - a single
h
-edge that ends in a leaf, not characterised further; - a single
j
-edge that ends in a leaf whose value differs from a given string; - a single
k
-edge that ends in an an inner node with an identifier of12345
; - zero or more
l
-edge that all end in leaves with numeric values;
note: predicates can nest recursively to match the structure of trees.
note: the Edge
-predicates above use plain strings to match edge labels, but they may more generally use qualified names with regular expressions on both namespace and local parts. For example, the following predicate:
Predicate p = tree( atleast("^part.*",tree( one(".*acme.org$",".*",num()))));
- characterises trees that have one or more edges whose labels begin with
part
and whose targets contain edges with no more than one edge with in a namespace that ends withacme.org
and with a numeric value.
For a full list of available predicate and constraint generators, see the code documentation of the Predicates
and Constraints
classes.
Matching and Pruning
A gDoc
predicate can be projected over a gDoc
tree using the methods match()
and prune()
common to all Predicate
s. The first indicates whether tree satisfies the predicate, the second prunes it of all the nodes that are not matched by the predicate.
Consider this simple example:
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.constraints.Constraints.*; import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.predicates.Predicates.*; Date d = new Date(); GDoc doc = gdoc( e("a",-1), e("a",1), e("a",2), e("b","..."), e("b",n( e("b1","..."))), e("c",n( e("c1",d), e("c2","..."))), e("d","...")); Predicate p = tree( many("a",num(more(0))), atleast("b",tree()), one("c", tree( one("c1",date())))); assert p.matches(doc)==true; GDoc pruned = gdoc( e("a",1), e("a",2), e("b",n( e("b1","..."))), e("c",n( e("c1",d)))); assert pruned.equals(p.prune(doc));
Here, it is easy to see that the gDoc
tree satisfies the predicate. Accordingly, match()
returns true
and prune()
successfully reduces the tree to include only the paths from the root which are directly described by the predicate (i.e. a tree equivalent to pruned
in the example). If the tree had had a second c
-edge, for example, match
would have returned false
and prune()
would have failed with an exception. Note that, If the tree had had no b
-edges, or if its b
-edges had all ended in leaves, or in fact under any of a number of alternative assumptions, the outcome would have been equally negative.
note: match()
does never fail, as a gDoc
tree either satisfies the predicate or it does not. In contrast, prune
fails whenever the tree does not match the predicate. In other words, prune
subsumes match
and reacts with a failure to mismatches.
note: Edge
predicates are applied in order and each predicate can match any edge that has not been matched by previous predicates.
In the projection above, all the constraints applied to the data of interest, i.e. parts of the trees that were not to be pruned. Often, however, the requirement is to characterise parts of tree while retaining others. For this, some predicates at the edges can be marked as conditions, as shown in the following example:
Date d = new Date(); GDoc doc = gdoc( e("a",-1), e("a",1), e("a",2), e("b","..."), e("b",n( e("b1","..."))), e("c",n( e("c1",d), e("c2","..."))), e("d","...")); Predicate p = tree( many("a",num(more(0))), cond(atleast("b",tree())), one("c", tree( one("c1",date())))); GDoc pruned = gdoc( e("a",1), e("a",2), e("c",n( e("c1",d)))); assert pruned.equals(p.prune(doc));
Here the predicate includes a condition on b
-edges. At prune time, the condition is used to match the tree but it does not imply that matching edges ought to be preserved.
note: condition predicates do not alter the semantics of match()
, only prune()
.
Another common requirement for pruning projections is to preserve all the children of a given node, as long as some children satisfy some constraints. As an example, consider the following document:
GDoc doc = gdoc( e("a",n( e("b",-1), e("c","..."), e("d","..."), e("e","..."))), e("a",n( e("b","notanumber"), e("c","..."), e("d","..."), e("e","..."))));
One may wish to prune this document so as to retain the a
nodes whose b
child contains a number. One can then use regular expressions and AnyType
to preserve all the children of a
nodes that do not need to be explicitly characterised, as shown below:
p = tree(many("a", tree( one("b",num()),tail()))); GDoc pruned = gdoc( e("a",n( e("b",-1), e("c","..."), e("d","..."), e("e","...")))); p.prune(doc); assertEquals(pruned, doc);
Here, Predicates.tail()
is a factory method for the common Edge
predicate many(".*",any())
, which achieves the desired result.
Finally, note that cond()
and tail
can be combined to discard all the children of a given node. The following example illustrates:
p = tree(many("a", tree( cond(tail()))); GDoc pruned = gdoc(e("a",n())); p.prune(doc); assertEquals(pruned, doc);
note: The factory method Predicates.cut()
is available as a shortcut for cond(tail())
.
Serialising and Deserialising Predicates
The predicate and constraint classes are ready for JAXB bindings to XML (i.e. contain appropriate JAXB annotations). In addition, the Predicates
class encapsulates a JAXB context and exposes javax.xml.bind.Marshaller
s and javax.xml.bind.Unmarshaller
s ready for client use (cf. getMarshaller()
, getUnmarshaller
).
For example, a client that needs works with character streams may operate as follows:
import static org.gcube.contentmanagement.contentmanager.stubs.model.predicates.Predicates.*; //serialise predicate Predicate p1 = ...; Writer w = ... getMarshaller().marshal(p,w); //deserialise predicate Reader r =... Predicate p2 = (Predicate) getUnmarshaller().unmarshal(r);
note: clients who use the Content Management libraries do not explicitly need to worry about conversion to and from DOM representations of predicates. The libraries perform conversions on their behalf.
The following is an example of predicate serialisation (namespaces are omitted for simplicity):
The full schemas of gDoc
tree predicates and constraints is available here.